Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Womens Health ; 23(1): 112, 2023 03 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36934289

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is one of the most common vaginal dysbiosis in women aged 15-44 years old. METHODS: We administered a cross-sectional, single timepoint survey to women ages 18 years or older and who have had bacterial vaginosis (BV). Women completed an anonymous online survey evaluating the impact of BV on their quality of life, how effective different types of treatments were and the amount of self-diagnosed vs. provider diagnosed BV episodes they had. RESULTS: 62 participants completed the anonymous online survey. With a self-reported median number of BV episodes in the past year was 4 (IQR 1-7). Among these women 69.8% reported BV had a negative impact on their sexual health, 67.7% on their physical health, 74.6% on their mental health. More than half of the respondents had used probiotics with oral Lactobacillus sp. (53.2%), mainly by oral route, and over a third had used vaginal boric acid (37.1%). Most women were unaware of Lactobacillus crispatus. Lactobacillus probiotics were more likely to be tried by women who were negatively impacted by BV for overall quality of life (p = 0.033), sexual health (p = 0.002), and mental health (p = 0.006) while boric acid use was more likely to be used by women who were negatively impacted by BV for their sexual health (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: BV is associated with negative quality of life and the women most impacted are seeking alternative treatments such as probiotics (Lactobacillus) and boric acid. There needs to be improvements in BV treatment that include alternative therapy options that have demonstrated efficacy with standardized composition, formulation and dosage.


Assuntos
Probióticos , Vaginose Bacteriana , Feminino , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Vaginose Bacteriana/terapia , Vaginose Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Transversais , Vagina/microbiologia , Lactobacillus
2.
Am Fam Physician ; 106(4): 397-404, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36260896

RESUMO

Endometriosis is an inflammatory condition caused by the presence of endometrial tissue in extra-uterine locations and can involve bowel, bladder, and all peritoneal structures. It is one of the most common gynecologic disorders, affecting up to 10% of people of reproductive age. Presentation of endometriosis can vary widely, from infertility in asymptomatic people to debilitating pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and period-related gastrointestinal or urinary symptoms. Diagnosis of endometriosis in the primary care setting is clinical and often challenging, frequently resulting in delayed diagnosis and treatment. Although transvaginal ultrasonography is used to evaluate endometriosis of deep pelvic sites to rule out other causes of pelvic pain, magnetic resonance imaging is preferred if deep infiltrating endometriosis is suspected. Laparoscopy with biopsy remains the definitive method for diagnosis, although several gynecologic organizations recommend empiric therapy without immediate surgical diagnosis. Combined hormonal contraceptives with or without nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are first-line options in managing symptoms and have a tolerable adverse effect profile. Second-line treatments include gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor agonists with add-back therapy, GnRH receptor antagonists, and danazol. Aromatase inhibitors are reserved for severe disease. All of these treatments are effective but may cause additional adverse effects. Referral to gynecology for surgical management is indicated if empiric therapy is ineffective, immediate diagnosis and treatment are necessary, or patients desire pregnancy. Alternative treatments have limited benefit in alleviating pain symptoms but may warrant further investigation.


Assuntos
Endometriose , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Aromatase/uso terapêutico , Anticoncepcionais , Danazol/uso terapêutico , Endometriose/terapia , Endometriose/tratamento farmacológico , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/uso terapêutico , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Dor Pélvica/terapia , Dor Pélvica/tratamento farmacológico , Receptores LHRH/uso terapêutico
3.
Int J STD AIDS ; 31(14): 1352-1358, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32996866

RESUMO

Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis and Trichomonas vaginalis infections are a public health concern and cost the United States' healthcare system 16 billion dollars annually. By minimizing barriers to testing, an increased number of infections can be detected and treated. A home-based point-of-care (POC) sexually transmitted infection (STI) test may reduce personal, structural, social and system-level barriers to STI testing. This study assesses patient preferences and acceptance of home-based POC STI testing. We performed a cross-sectional, single-visit study of women aged 18 years and older at a single site. Women completed an anonymous online survey evaluating interest in POC STI testing, comfort in self-collecting vaginal swabs and participant reaction to a positive STI result. 138 participants completed the anonymous online survey. The survey results indicate high acceptability with self-collection of samples and home POC STI testing. A majority of participants were interested or very interested in a home POC STI device-especially amongst women with a past history of a STI. If receiving a positive test result, participants indicated they would want to have someone to discuss their results with, most preferring to speak with their primary care provider. Women on lower incomes were less comfortable and less interested with home testing. Women are likely to be receptive to home POC STI testing. Adapting to home-based testing will require engagement of primary care providers for management and surveillance of STIs.


Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Chlamydia trachomatis/isolamento & purificação , Gonorreia/diagnóstico , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/isolamento & purificação , Testes Imediatos , Tricomoníase/diagnóstico , Vaginite por Trichomonas/diagnóstico , Trichomonas vaginalis/isolamento & purificação , Adolescente , Adulto , California , Infecções por Chlamydia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Gonorreia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Autocuidado/métodos , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Tricomoníase/epidemiologia , Vaginite por Trichomonas/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
4.
Am Fam Physician ; 99(12): 751-759, 2019 06 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31194487

RESUMO

Globally, approximately 20% of the 400 million individuals with diabetes mellitus have diabetic kidney disease (DKD). DKD is associated with higher cardiovascular and all-cause morbidity and mortality, so timely diagnosis and treatment are critical. Screening for early DKD is best done with annual spot urine albumin/creatinine ratio testing, and diagnosis is confirmed by repeated elevation in urinary albumin excretion. Treatment includes management of hyperglycemia, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and cessation of tobacco use. Multiple antihyperglycemic medications, including sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors, may help prevent DKD by lowering blood glucose levels and through intrinsic renal protection. Blood pressure should be monitored at every clinical visit and maintained at less than 140/90 mm Hg to prevent microvascular changes. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers prevent progression of DKD and may decrease albuminuria. Statin therapy should be considered for all patients with DKD, and tobacco cessation reduces the risk of DKD. Given the complexity of the disease and the risk of poor outcomes, patients who progress to stage 3 DKD or beyond may benefit from referral to nephrology subspecialists.


Assuntos
Albuminúria/diagnóstico , Albuminúria/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Nefropatias Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Nefropatias Diabéticas/tratamento farmacológico , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Currículo , Complicações do Diabetes/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatologia , Nefropatias Diabéticas/etiologia , Educação Médica Continuada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
5.
Fam Med ; 47(10): 789-93, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26545056

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Physicians frequently fail to document obesity and obesity-related counseling. We sought to determine whether attaching a physical reminder card to patient encounter forms would increase electronic medical record (EMR) assessment of and documentation of obesity and dietary counseling. METHODS: Reminder cards for obesity documentation were attached to encounter forms for patient encounters over a 2-week intervention period. For visits in the intervention period, the EMR was retrospectively reviewed for BMI, assessment of "obesity" or "morbid obesity" as an active problem, free-text dietary counseling within physician notes, and assessment of "dietary counseling" as an active problem. These data were compared to those collected through a retrospective chart review during a 2-week pre-intervention period. We also compared physician self-report of documentation via reminder cards with EMR documentation. RESULTS: We found significant improvement in the primary endpoint of assessment of "obesity" or "morbid obesity" as an active problem (42.5% versus 28%) compared to the pre-intervention period. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoints of free-text dietary counseling or assessment of "dietary counseling" as an active problem between the groups. Physician self-reporting of assessment of "obesity" or "morbid obesity" as an active problem (77.7% versus 42.5%), free-text dietary counseling on obesity (69.1% versus 35.4%) and assessment of "dietary counseling" as an active problem (54.3% versus 25.2%) were all significantly higher than those reflected in EMR documentation. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that physical reminder cards are a successful means of increasing obesity documentation rates among providers but do not necessarily increase rates of obesity-related counseling or documentation of counseling. Our study suggests that even with such interventions, physicians are likely under-documenting obesity and counseling compared to self-reported rates.


Assuntos
Aconselhamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Documentação/estatística & dados numéricos , Obesidade/terapia , Médicos de Família/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Alerta/estatística & dados numéricos , Índice de Massa Corporal , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Humanos , Sobrepeso/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , População Urbana
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...